The Band Saw Can Be Your Very Best Friend

posted: Thu 27th Dec, 2007, categories: Tools, Shell, & Supplies

That was the name of a film my brother had to watch in shop class when he was a youngster.  He is no longer a youngster; there are actual people in this world that call him "Dad," and it STILL blows my mind.  Anyway, he reminded me of that film when I told him that I’d gotten a band saw.  This band saw, as a matter of fact.  It is small, but I work on a small scale; it’s not like I’m trying to mill my own wood here, but resawing and cutting to size would be nice.  The circular saw is overkill for the latter task.

Truth is that although I’ve had the saw for 2 weeks, it’s still in the box.  I am afraid of what all goes into setting one up and getting it to play nice.  But in today’s mail, I got a flyer from Woodcraft, and wouldn’t you know it, but they have a beginning "Band Saw Techniques" class Thursday, January 3rd.  4 hours of orientation, which I can then supplement with my manual and my books as needed, for $75.  It’s worth it to me; I’d like to have the greatest chance of success, and competent use of tools is the top way to assure that, I’m thinking.  Plus, I’ve kind of grown used to having fingers, and would like to keep mine.  So I’ll put the saw together this weekend, and then next Thursday take a couple hours off work to head across town and take the class. I imagine I’ll be the only woman there; it wouldn’t be the first time.  I have it on good authority that chicks who use power tools are sexy.

New shell and stone

posted: Wed 7th Nov, 2007, categories: Tools, Shell, & Supplies

 No sawing this past weekend after all, but my shell and stone from Rob’s Bits (on eBay). I decided to try the carnelian because it was inexpensive, interesting, and already of proper thickness for inlay.  Now we’ll see if my saw will cut it.  But the real surprise of the day was the paua.

Carnelian and new paua

It wasn’t cheap, I admit, but it wasn’t terrible for the size and thickness (which is totally as advertised and consistent), and the appearance is just absolutely gorgeous.  This is the "bad" side.  Ha!

New Paua...the

 

And here’s the flip side of those same pieces:

New Paua

It was so gorgeous that I decided I needed all he had, so I went to eBay and bought him out, at least for the moment.  Fortunately, he does "buy it now" on almost all his stuff, which I like.  I had bid on one of his auctions and lost, so the next time I just bought them outright.  I will keep an eye on his store; paua isn’t going to last forever, and these pieces are incredibly beautiful, as well as sizeable.  I told Athena I wasn’t going to hoard shell, but I have a weakness for paua, despite all its holey, sandy, sawblade-busting frustration.  It’s just so delicious.

I really must start attending my own lectures.

posted: Mon 10th Sep, 2007, categories: Uncategorized, Tools, Shell, & Supplies, Borrowed wisdom

Well, this weekend, in the spirit of taking a break from inlay, I made this guy out of a pair of socks.  He’s homely, but he’s supposed to be.  You’d be homely, too, if you were made out of socks.  I rather like him.  And I didn’t saw off any fingers trying to make him.  Woohoo!

Saturday also saw the arrival of my newest book order.  I am probably in need of a saw, maybe band, maybe scroll, maybe I have no idea.  So I do what I always do:  got a book on it, to learn about all the tools, so that should I decide I have money burning a hole in my pocket, I can make an intelligent purchase.  Right now, it’s sitting on the bookcase, but it’s ready at a moment’s notice if need be. 

New book, to help me shop.

Saturday night I also scribed my fuschia project, with the idea of perhaps tackling the routing on Sunday.  That was not to be, as my body was in full rebellion, and I spent the day resting with a book.  It waits on my bench.

Monday, I was rereading old e-mails, and I found one from my friend Shenry.  He had asked me the following:  "To what extent can we actually change ourselves? Do we have the capability to go from Kristie to Siddhartha? Do we have the capability to go from shenry to Reza Zadeh (2004 Olympic Weightlifting Gold Medalist)? Or are we limited by personality programming, physical ability, dna, and our environments?"

And this was my response:

"To what extent can we change ourselves?  To the level of our desire and our definitions of success.  One cannot go without the other.  For example, with the guitar, I have many, many more things to learn, and I hope to learn them, and am working toward learning them.  However, the reality is, I have already achieved all my dreams in re: to playing and performing when I started down this road.  By all my definitions, I am a success at this activity and could quit now without NEEDING to evolve anymore.  However, I’d like to evolve further because I enjoy it, and while I might like to evolve indefinitely, there is the reality that my hands and joints already give me trouble, and it could cause me problems down the road that would make further evolution on the playing front difficult, if not impossible.  And if I am attached to only a single definition of "guitar success," I’m going to have a real heavy emotional price to pay if/when that day comes.  And in that, I guess it really is a Zen thing.  Are you committed to evolution, or a specific outcome, a very limited evolution?  If you’re committed to evolution itself, you will never stop evolving and changing; there are no limits.  Even if you never become Reza Zadeh, you might evolve into someone else’s Blenda down the road.  However, if you’re committed to becoming Rezah Zadeh, and only in doing so will you stamp yourself "successful," then you are going to most likely be limited.  However, even a cursory examination will indicate that you put the limitation on yourself before you even started, rather than it being imposed upon you from without.  If you’re trying to become something specific and limited, there will be limitations; but if you are trying to BECOME, well, then, there’s no stopping you.
 
That is not to say visualizing a goal and working toward it isn’t valuable.  Thought, word, deed, and all that.  It’s the attachment to the goal, and the dismissal of all other possibilities that could come of it as failures, that’s going to cause us problems.  I have big dreams for my inlay project.  I would like to get out of this cubicle and do it professionally, work with my hands creating beauty instead of e-mails.  I’ve named my company already.  It’s a goal.  I’m visualizing it.  I’m talking about it, at least to myself.  I’m working toward it.  But I have a long way to go, as I’m just beginning, and I cannot say what will happen.  My interests may change, my patience may not hold out long enough to learn the skills I need to make it as a pro, I may lose an arm in a freak accident, I may be making perfect progress on my way to that goal and die before I get there.  And yet, here I am, working on it, knowing all of the above to be true, because what else do I have to do?  I’m here. May as well do something interesting."

That was my mistake:  attaching to one goal as the only definition of success, and anything that didn’t meet it was a failure.  I knew the answer so clearly in February, but somehow forgot it between there and here.  But it is the right answer.  If I can just get out of my own way, hip-check my ego off to the side, and get back to enjoying puttering in my shop, I will be happier, and I have to believe the work will get better.

Project #9 begins

posted: Tue 28th Aug, 2007, categories: Uncategorized, Tools, Shell, & Supplies

In other news, after I routed and glued Saturday, I decided to get to gluing patterns to material for project #9, the fuchsia. I bought pink mussel, purpleheart that has, after several months in the garage, stayed purple, and some Rhodonite reconstituted stone. I hadn’t really thought about how I was going to use them yet, and wasn’t all that up on fuschia coloration, so I took a trip into the house to google some pictures. Then I had choices to make.

The rhodonite and purpleheart looked good together. The pink mussel and the purpleheart looked good together. The rhodonite and pink mussel not so much, and the mussel was much more subtle in coloring than the rhodonite. I had a picture of a fuchsia that was more pink and light pink, and thought that might look nice in a real subtle inlay at some point, though it would lack in verisimilitude. I wanted verisimilitude this time out.
P8250009

I decided to go with the rhodonite and purpleheart for the flowers and buds, and had planned all along to use paua for the plant stems, curved strips for the circular bit, and I still had a few pieces for the parts connecting to the flowers. That leaves me but one piece of paua in my stash. I may have to check out eBay for more. I love the look of paua, but it is hard to work with—riddled with worm holes, at least the batch I got was.
P8250014
v That left me with a decision to make. With what was I going to do the bits that come out of the open flower? I looked again at the pink mussel, and had a piece with some nice stripes in it. My plan all along was to cut that out as one piece and then engrave the separate pieces, but depending on how the figure works out, maybe the suggestion will be enough. We shall see.
P8250010

The curved strips will be fit in as appropriate once the main body of the piece is assembled. I figure it’s free-form anyway, and I don’t want to paint myself in a corner with it by starting with it. So this next project will have 3 types of material, one totally new to me; engraving, which I haven’t tried yet; and some challenging routing. I may have bitten off more than I can chew. But I’m going to try anyway.